Greenhouse alternatives (2026): 8 tools compared for buyers
Looking for an alternative to Greenhouse? These 8 tools do the same job with a different focus. Each one is compared on who it suits, its key features, pros and cons, and what each vendor publishes on security, admin and contract terms.
Why buyers look beyond Greenhouse
- Limited customization, especially in reporting and scheduling.
- Steep learning curve and some functionality gaps.
- Small teams that need a published price or a self-serve start.
- Buyers who want heavy report and scheduling customization out of the box (a common review complaint)
From Greenhouse's published plan limits and recurring themes in public reviews. See the Greenhouse review for the full picture.
Greenhouse alternatives at a glance
| Tool | Best for | Starting price | Free plan or trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-size and enterprise teams that want structured interviews, scorecards and deep integrations. | Contact sales | No | |
| Teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool. | Contact sales | No | |
| Startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price. | $400/month (All-In-One Foundations, up to 100 employees) | No | |
| High-volume and mid-market to enterprise hiring. | Starting at $14,995 (Essential), unit/period not stated | No | |
| Large employers with complex high-volume hiring. | Contact sales | No | |
| Small and mid-size teams that want a published price and a 15-day trial. | $299/mo (Standard, monthly billing) | Free trial | |
| Small and mid-size US companies that want HRIS first and light recruiting in the same system. | $250/mo flat (Core, 25 or fewer employees); $10 to $10.25 per employee per month above that | No | |
| Small teams and agencies that want a per-recruiter price with a free one-job plan. | Free (1 active job); paid plans from about $25 per user per month billed annually per third-party sources | Free plan, Free trial | |
| Small businesses that want a published annual price. | $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually) | No |
The 8 best Greenhouse alternatives
Lever
Combined ATS and recruiting CRM from Employ, sold on quote-only pricing with AI screening and interview summaries.
Recruiting teams that want sourcing and tracking in one system, particularly those already in the Employ family, should request a quote. No SCIM provisioning is reported on any plan. Ask how candidate moves and pauses work, as reviewers call them fiddly.
- Best for
- Teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool.
- Company size
- Positioned by third-party research as the 'scalable hiring' tier in Employ's lineup (mid-size)
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI screening included in core platform per vendor.
Pros
- Well-organized candidate management.
- Automation saves recruiter time.
Cons
- Pausing or moving candidates can feel complicated.
- Customer support and customization limits, plus integration issues.
Pricing: Contact sales
Ashby
All-in-one ATS, scheduling, sourcing and analytics platform popular with fast-growing tech companies, priced $400/month for startups up to 100 employees.
Startups under 100 employees that want sourcing, scheduling and analytics inside the ATS can budget from one published figure, $400 a month for Foundations. During evaluation, price the extras separately, because SSO and advanced scheduling are paid add-ons and EU data residency is unconfirmed.
- Best for
- Startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price.
- Company size
- Startups to enterprise; Foundations up to 100 employees.
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI credits: 1,500/month on Foundations.
- Interview scheduling
- Advanced Scheduling is a paid add-on.
- Careers page and candidate experience
- Up to 5 brands on Foundations, unlimited on Plus and Enterprise.
Pros
- Easy to use and efficient for recruiting teams.
- Responsive, knowledgeable support.
- Broad feature set and customizable workflows.
Cons
- Reporting and data volume can feel overwhelming.
- A few reviewers find the interface unintuitive.
Pricing: $400/month (All-In-One Foundations, up to 100 employees)
SmartRecruiters
Enterprise-leaning ATS now owned by SAP, with a published entry price of $14,995 and quote-only higher tiers.
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise-leaning ATS now owned by SAP, with four tiers and a published Essential price of $14,995. It suits high-volume and mid-market hiring and SAP SuccessFactors customers, not small budgets.
- Best for
- High-volume and mid-market to enterprise hiring.
- Company size
- G2 reviewers note high-volume hiring fit.
Key features
- HRIS and background check integrations
- Interoperable with SAP SuccessFactors and other HCM suites (SAP statement)
Pros
- Smooth candidate application process.
- Works for high-volume hiring.
Cons
- Trails rivals on overall G2 score.
Pricing: Starting at $14,995 (Essential), unit/period not stated
iCIMS
Enterprise talent acquisition suite, privately held, with no public prices and separate implementation fees.
Large employers running complex, high-volume hiring are the intended buyers, with pricing by quote and implementation fees on top. Allow time for the learning curve that G2 reviewers mention, and ask about customization limits and support response times before signing.
- Best for
- Large employers with complex high-volume hiring.
- Company size
- Enterprise and mid-market (third-party)
Pros
- Recruiting efficiency.
- Reporting.
Cons
- Limited customization.
- Steep learning curve.
- Slow support response.
Pricing: Contact sales
Workable
Recruiting platform with published monthly prices by company-size tier and AI credit packs for sourcing and screening.
Small and mid-size companies that want a published price can start at $299 a month on monthly billing and test with the 15-day trial. Look closely at credit-based AI screening, which uses one credit per candidate, and at which tier bundles video interviews and texting.
- Best for
- Small and mid-size teams that want a published price and a 15-day trial.
- Company size
- 1 to 1000+ employees, priced by tier.
Key features
- Resume parsing and screening
- AI screening credits: 1 credit per candidate screened; 3,000 free credits on paid accounts.
Pros
- Intuitive, user-friendly interface.
- Quick to set up.
Cons
- Not confirmed from review text in this research.
Pricing: $299/mo (Standard, monthly billing) · Free trial
BambooHR
Per-employee HRIS for small and mid-size US companies with a built-in ATS capped by job openings per tier.
Choose it when HR records come first and recruiting is a lighter need. Companies with 25 or fewer employees get a flat $250 monthly rate. Check the open-job cap, which is 5, 25 or 50 by tier, and test whether its reporting satisfies your hiring managers.
- Best for
- Small and mid-size US companies that want HRIS first and light recruiting in the same system.
- Company size
- Small to mid-size; flat rates tuned to 25 or fewer employees.
Pros
- Clean interface and easy navigation.
- Fast, straightforward onboarding and good support scores.
Cons
- Limited features and weak customization.
- Reporting and approval options feel thin.
Pricing: $250/mo flat (Core, 25 or fewer employees); $10 to $10.25 per employee per month above that
Zoho Recruit
Low-cost, per-recruiter ATS from Zoho with a free tier and separate staffing-agency and corporate HR editions.
A fit for small teams, agencies and anyone already on Zoho CRM that wants per-recruiter pricing and a free single-job tier. Before buying, line up the editions against each other, since plan details are hard to compare, and note that premium support is billed extra.
- Best for
- Small teams and agencies that want a per-recruiter price with a free one-job plan.
- Company size
- G2 reviewers are 81.8% small business.
Key features
- Job multiposting
- Free job boards on Free plan; premium job boards from Standard.
- Pipeline and hiring-team collaboration
- Candidate management, email management and talent pipeline; assignment rules from Professional.
- Resume parsing and screening
- Resume management from Standard; AI candidate matching, screening and assessments from Professional.
- Interview scheduling
- Interview scheduling included even on Free plan; video interviews are a paid add-on.
Pros
- Broad toolset that covers the full recruiting process.
- Low price versus enterprise ATS.
- Ease of use scored about 8.5 of 10 on G2.
Cons
- Third-party roundups disagree on job limits and price, so plan details are confusing.
- Premium support is a separate paid add-on.
Pricing: Free (1 active job); paid plans from about $25 per user per month billed annually per third-party sources · Free plan, Free trial
JazzHR
Low-cost annual-plan ATS for small businesses, with a stated eligibility cap of about 250 employees.
JazzHR is a low-cost ATS for small businesses with a published annual price starting at $1,000. Reviewers praise easy setup and use, but standard pricing excludes companies over 250 employees, and customization is limited.
- Best for
- Small businesses that want a published annual price.
- Company size
- Small business; standard pricing excludes companies over 250 employees.
Key features
- Job multiposting
- Premium listings and syndication to more job boards available; posting limits by plan.
Pros
- Easy to use.
- Quick, simple implementation.
Cons
- Customization options are limited.
Pricing: $1,000/yr (Hero, billed annually)
How to choose a Greenhouse alternative
Start with what made you look: a missing feature, a team that outgrew the plan or a bill that grew faster than the team. Then compare the shortlist on the points that matter most for this kind of software.
- Job multiposting: Posting to many boards from one place saves recruiter time and widens reach.
- Pipeline and hiring-team collaboration: Scorecards and shared feedback keep managers aligned.
- Resume parsing and screening: Parsing and knockout questions cut manual review.
- Interview scheduling: Calendar sync removes back-and-forth with candidates.
- HRIS and background check integrations: Smooth handoff to onboarding and payroll avoids re-entry.
- Careers page and candidate experience: Affects application rates and employer brand.
Security, admin and contract terms compared
Switching tools means a new security review. This is what Greenhouse and each alternative state publicly about single sign-on, provisioning, audit logs and the contract; a blank means the vendor does not say.
| Tool | SAML SSO | SCIM | Audit logs | Contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All three tiers (Core, Plus, Pro) per the vendor plan table. | Not stated; vendor lists 'automated user management' for Plus and Pro only. | Pro only. | Annual contract assumed typical but not published; plans can be upgraded at any time per FAQ. | |
| Enterprise only (third-party source, unconfirmed) | Not offered natively (third-party source) | Not published | Not published | |
| Paid add-on, $100/month (SAML and OIDC supported) | Not confirmed from a primary source. | Not published | Monthly or yearly on Foundations. | |
| Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | |
| Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | |
| Listed under advanced features for all three plans (pricing page) | Not published | Not published | Standard can be billed monthly; Premier and Enterprise annual. | |
| SAML 2.0 via installable plugin app; plan not stated. | Not published | Not published | Month-to-month or extended term; volume discounts automatic; nonprofits get 15% off. | |
| Not published | Not published | Not published | Monthly plan available; 45-day money-back guarantee; 15-day trial. | |
| Add-on at $29/month for Hero, Plus or Pro. | Not published | Not published | Annual billing; plans upgradeable at any time. |
When to stay with Greenhouse
- Mid-size and enterprise teams that want structured interviews, scorecards and deep integrations.
- Companies that need an audit log and configurable session time-outs (Pro tier only)
Greenhouse alternatives: frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to Greenhouse?
Lever is the closest alternative for most teams: teams that want ATS and sourcing CRM in one tool. Ashby suits teams that startups up to 100 employees wanting one published monthly price.
Is there a free alternative to Greenhouse?
Zoho Recruit offers a free plan. Free plans usually cap users, features or history, so check the limits against your team size.